Is a microchip implant the “Mark of the Beast”
OBAMACARE (Original Bill) Required
RFID CHIP IMPLANT. Did you Know? Should you care? What are the implications?
Edited and compiled from multiple sources by John Sterling, (AMENDED 30 APR 2012)
Background Information
The “Chip”
Biochip technology
was originally developed in 1983 for monitoring fisheries. Today’s, biochip
implant is basically a small (micro) computer chip, inserted under the skin,
for identification purposes. The biochip implant system consists of two
components; a transponder and a reader or scanner. Latest technology permits tracking and even control of brain activity and other bodily functions.
How the technology is
being (or is planned to be) used (from various web sources)
(* Note the DATE on some of these press releases and imagine
how far we have come since then!)
In Psychology Today, April 1970, James McConnell, professor
of psychology at the University of Michigan, published an article 'Criminals
Can Be Brainwashed': '...the day has come when it should be possible to achieve
a very rapid and highly effective type of positive brainwashing that would
allow us to make dramatic changes in a person's behaviour and personality... We
should reshape our society so that we all would be trained from birth to want
to do what society wants us to do. We have the techniques now to do it...'.
In the 20-26th March 1995 edition of Defense News, Pat
Cooper penned 'Naval Research Lab Attempts To Meld Neurons and Chips: Studies
May Produce Army of "Zombies"'. In this he quotes William Tolles, the
[then] recently retired associate director of research at the Naval Research
Lab, 'Future battles could be waged with genetically engineered organisms, such
as rodents, whose minds are controlled by computer chips engineered with living
brain cells....
2001: "We appear to be edging towards an era of 'mind
control' - a time when human brains might be manipulated routinely by highly
sophisticated technology."
2002: A Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
military Brain Machine Interface article shows that research has continued
apace.
2003: The Defense Intelligence Agency state: 'It is possible
that future mechanical and computer chip implants in human beings could
stimulate new directions in anthropology and sociology.
2007: In the UK an RFID chip sewn into school clothing
"used to monitor pupils' movements and register their arrival in class on
the teacher's computer. Supply teachers can also be alerted if a student is likely
to misbehave." The Times, Sat October 20th.
2008: "Prisoners to be chipped like dogs."
"We track cars so why not people," Ken Jones, president of the
Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO). The Independent, UK, Sun January
13th. Note that the GPS mentioned is not possible with current RFID but is
possible with a mobile phone and an implant acting together as per other
previous medical projects. New Zealand Herald reports on this too.
At Imperial College London, there is an Oracle backed
project to provide implanted sensors that can monitor the body's critical
faculties and relay them via the patient's mobile to their doctor.
Professor Robert Langer of MIT, developed the concept of an
implantable drug delivery system after watching a public television documentary
on computers. The small chip, which is implanted below the waist and under the
skin, can release the correct amount of medicine into the body at precise
times.
According to a recent survey, one in four Germans is
enthusiastic about the idea of having a chip implanted as long as there are
tangible benefits involved. Those benefits don’t even have to be of the
life-and-death nature; some said they would implant a chip simply to make a
shopping experience more enjoyable.
WALTHAM, Mass – February 16, 2012 – MicroCHIPS, Inc., a
developer of implantable drug delivery devices and biosensors, announces today
the results of the first successful human clinical trial with an implantable,
wirelessly controlled and programmable microchip-based drug delivery device.
The Bible
The MARK of the beast is mentioned eight times in the book
of Revelation: For brevity I will list the references- you look them up
yourself if you are interested. These verses represent most of what we know
about “the mark of the beast”.
Revelation
13:16-18 Revelation 14:9 Revelation 14:11 Revelation 15:2 Revelation 16:2 Revelation 19:20 Revelation 20:4
It is not my intent to get “down in the weeds” about whether
the Microchip IS THE MARK, or whether it will simply be the technology utilized
to control the “buying and selling” and the actual “mark is an externally
visible tattoo or something similar. A
little research on the web will reveal that a great deal has already been
written on this subject. Research, and pray, and make up
your mind. Suffice it to say that the
road to servitude is likely to be gradual-incremental- and will likely be
composed of many small steps. When
people are under sufficient pressure, they will make decisions that will take
them down the path of least resistance.
When the Social Security program was enacted in 1935, the
public was skeptical. Many were reluctant (or refused) to be “numbered”. Now, it is extremely rare to find a person in
America who does not accept the social security identification as completely normal
and acceptable. A CNN poll in 1999 found
that 47% of those surveyed would have no problem accepting a microchip implant,
as opposed to 53% who would NOT want the procedure done.
Although, as a Christian, I believe that God will reveal His
will to His children at the right time, I also believe that we should engage in
careful bible study to diligently SEEK the truth of God through
discernment. Any careful Bible study should never force a conclusion
or stretch scripture to conform to some preconceived outcome. Study the WORD of
God, pray that the Spirit of Truth will guide your understanding, and be
prepared to accept alternative “conclusions” that, while supported by
scripture, do not conform to something you have already been taught.
It seems clear that, in the end, all people on earth will be
given a choice to follow Anti-Christ or not. The problem, as I see it, is that
it is HARDER to make the distinction between “right and wrong” or “good and
evil” when one is playing in the devils playpen, so to speak. It
will be much more difficult (perhaps impossible) for people, once accustomed to the convenience and
security of the implantable chip, to make a choice NOT to maintain their
lifestyle choices once the technology becomes connected to a CHOICE to serve
Anti-Christ. Imagine being given this
choice: Continue being able to buy
life-giving meds for grandma, or your sick child, and to buy groceries, and fix
that painful tooth ache, etc. by simply declaring an oath to support the world
leader. In that oath, you agree NOT to
be obedient to any other person. In
return, you may live in your home, keep your job, buy the necessities for your
family, maybe even take that well-deserved vacation. Is that a big stretch? Because that is “human nature” you would foolishly
be courting (eternal) disaster to believe that you are somehow not affected or
influenced by natural laws, or by erroneously pretending that you are a
spiritual giant, unaffected by natural instincts.
Tithing, Fasting, and Sexual
Abstinence
These are three areas where our carnal flesh is most often
tempted. In truth, we NEED (in some degree) money, food, and sex. Yet, God
challenges us, exhorts us, commands us, to practice self-denial with respect to
those areas of our “natural” life.
Reality check…How are you doing with those simple acts of
self-denial? Like working out in the gym
to build strong muscles, our spiritual work-out (denying the flesh) trains us
to be more spiritually focused and spiritually strong. It is the height of self-deception to imagine
that we could resist the incredible temptation to deny Jesus and declare allegiance
to some worldly king if that is the ONLY thing standing between our peace and
security and/or then end of actual, physical suffering of ourselves or our
close family and friends. Now, what
about the law?
OBAMA CARE (AS ORIGINALLY DRAFTED) REQUIRED
AN IMPLANT
CORRECTION: Added 30 APRIL, 2012 - The final Bill as passed DOES NOT contain this requirement, as the language was removed from the former version. I AM LEAVING this post active, and essentially unchanged, because IT IS IMPORTANT for readers to understand exactly where SOME of our politicians INTEND to take us. I am GRATEFUL for those who try to hold the line, but I SUSPECT that it will not be long before they will become such a minority that their voices will be silenced. I apologize that this was published before I completed my research but I DO NOT apologize for ringing the alarm bell. The price of FREEDOM is eternal vigilance. JAS
CORRECTION: Added 30 APRIL, 2012 - The final Bill as passed DOES NOT contain this requirement, as the language was removed from the former version. I AM LEAVING this post active, and essentially unchanged, because IT IS IMPORTANT for readers to understand exactly where SOME of our politicians INTEND to take us. I am GRATEFUL for those who try to hold the line, but I SUSPECT that it will not be long before they will become such a minority that their voices will be silenced. I apologize that this was published before I completed my research but I DO NOT apologize for ringing the alarm bell. The price of FREEDOM is eternal vigilance. JAS
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) passed the Senate on December 24, 2009 and
the House of representatives on March 21, 2010 by a Senate rule known as "Reconciliation" where amendments are passed and the actual bill is then "deemed" passed without a floor vote.
FROM THE ORIGINAL HOUSE BILL (HR 3200): Looking at section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1, we read:
FROM THE ORIGINAL HOUSE BILL (HR 3200): Looking at section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1, we read:
“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device
registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate
analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or
has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is— ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class
II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”
What exactly is a
class II device that is implantable? It is the device approved by the FDA
in 2004.
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act:
www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuid...
A class II implantable device is an "implantable radio
frequency transponder system for patient identification and health
information." The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in
medical patients such as "claims data, patient survey data, standardized
analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate
data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed
appropriate by the Secretary."
The PPACA also orders the creation of the national medical
device registry in section 2521, page 1002 line 5:
“In developing the registry, the secretary shall…”
And the law continues on with a laundry list of items that
the secretary must do in the process of creating this registry. In this laundry
list of items to do, Line 17, subparagraph B: "validating methods for
analyzing patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and for
linking such data with the information included in the registry as described in
subparagraph (A)"
Going back to subparagraph A [right above subparagraph B],
it says: “including in the registry, in a manner consistent with subsection
(f), appropriate information to identify each device described in paragraph (1)
by type, model, and serial number or other unique identifier;”
Don’t be confused by the intentional obfuscation and
skillful wording, This law first creates the national device registry and then
immediately list all the task the secretary of health and human services will
have do in the process of creating this registry.
The very first two items in the list mandates that the
secretary first gives a unique identification to each of the items listed in
paragraph 1 which is:
‘‘a class III
device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable.”
Then, the very next thing the secretary is to do is to
create the process by which “patient safety and outcomes data from multiple
sources”, which is electronic medical records, that are linked to these newly
and uniquely identified items from paragraph 1 which are the class III and
class II implantable devices.
Class III devises are items such as breast implants,
pacemakers, heart valves, etc. A Class II device that is implantable is, as you
seen from the FDA, an implantable radio frequency transponder, RFID chip. From
breast implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one is the only possible
one that can used for the stated purpose in section B which is, “for linking
such data with the information included in the registry”? As we know from
subsection A, the information in the registry is the name of a device. In plain
speak, we are in a clear way being told that our electronic medical records are
going to be linked to a class II implantable device!
Continuing a few lines down in this same section, section B
subsection ii on still on page 1002, the “patient safety and outcomes data from
multiple sources”, that is to be linked is clearly spelled out as electronic
medical records. It reads: “link data
obtained under clause (i) with information in the registry”. Information in the
registry is, as we know from subparagraph A, the name of the device. So what is
the data obtained under clause i? Back up a few lines to clause i
It reads: “obtain access to disparate sources of patient
safety and outcomes data, including Federal health-related electronic data”.
Again, from breast implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one is the only
possible one that can used for the stated purpose in section B? That stated
purpose is “for linking such data” and the “such data” is electronic medical
records.
In case the law wasn’t clear enough on that point, still in
the laundry list of things to do a few more lines down on the next page, page
1005
“The Secretary to protect the public health; shall establish
procedures to permit linkage of information submitted pursuant to subparagraph
(A, remember subparagraph A is the class 2 implantable device reference) with
patient safety and outcomes data obtained under paragraph (3, which is
electronic medical records); and to permit analyses of linked data;”
Continuing on to page 1007, in the STANDARDS, IMPLEMENTATION
CRITERIA, AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA section, the secretary of health and human
services is given full power to intact all mandates from the laundry list of
to-do items in the creation process of the registry as well as dictate how the
devises listed in the National Medical Device Registry are to be used and
implemented.
"The Secretary of the Health Human Services, acting
through the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health
Information Technology, shall adopt standards, implementation specifications,
and certification criteria for the electronic exchange and use in certified
electronic health records of a unique device identifier for each device
described in paragraph 1 (National Medical Device Registry), if such an identifier
is required by section 519(f) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21
U.S.C. 360i(f)) for the device."
Page 503,
section E Lines 13-17 reads: "encourage, as appropriate, the
development and use of clinical registries and the development of clinical
effectiveness research data networks from electronic health records, post
marketing drug and medical device surveillance efforts". Let me say that
again, medical device surveillance efforts!
Now lets look at section 163 of the PPACA, which gives the
government a direct electronic access to your bank account which will work in
conjunction with an implanted chip.
Page 58 Lines 5 through 15 reads:
(D) enable the real-time (or near real time) determination
of an individual’s financial responsibility at the point of service and, to the
extent possible, prior to service, including whether the individual is eligible
for a specific service with a specific physician at a specific facility, which
may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identity
detection card; (E) enable, where feasible, near real-time adjudication of
claims.
(Above excerpts from http://beforeitsnews.com/story/665/502/Hidden_Obamacare_Secret:_RFID_Chip_Implants_Mandatory_for_All_by_March_23,_2013.html )
SUMMARY
What does this mean? It means that the government will give
everybody a health ID card that contains a machine readable device (magnetic
strip or RFID chip) similar to a credit card. Embedded in this chip or strip is
your Health Identification Number. When you visit a medical provider, the
medical claims will be processed while you are still in the office. The medical
providers will be paid in real time. The portion that you owe will be deducted
from your bank account, in real time, according to this law.
As it stands now (still awaiting a final Ruling by the
Supreme Court) the amended version of the bill (two bills, actually combined) is the law of the land. If you break the law, you are a
criminal. Would you risk your eternal soul by submitting to the law, if the law required an implant? THE BIGGER QUESTION IS: Are you “dallying
with the devil” if you consent to grow more and more comfortable with
government-controlled housing, education, healthcare, economy, environment,
family dynamics and even religion? This
question is bigger than whether the microchip IS the mark of the beast…it is
about whether you can serve God AND Mammon. Jesus says you cannot. What say ye?
Laws are made for the lawless, - and are we not suppose to obey the laws of the land. How does obeying the laws of the land affect our walk with God?
ReplyDeleteThe Biblical directive to obey the government is built upon the presumption that the law is righteous. My articles on "Render Unto Caesar" and other should explain this in more detail. The Bible contains examples of civil disobedience when the children of God must choose whether to obey God or man. The Christian needs to learn to walk humbly, in submission to Word of God, led by Spirit of Truth, in Holy boldness. The law of man is to be obeyed inasmuch as it conforms to the law of God. It is not always crystal clear, at least in the wisdom of man. So , we pray for one another, and we "forsake not the assembling of ourselves together" and submit to one another in brotherly love (in civil harmony) so that we provide a "check and balance" against our human nature. JAS
ReplyDelete